Why take the risk with remakes? Despite the potential pitfalls, the TV and film industries seem obsessed with revivals, remakes, and reboots. From Prison Break and Dallas to Heroes and Wentworth, there’s been a mix of misfires and masterstrokes. Now, the Stephen King classic IT gets the same treatment, with anticipation high and expectations higher.

As a long-time fan of both the book and the 1990 mini-series, I approached the remake with a mix of curiosity and caution. With nearly a dozen readings of the novel and several viewings of the original adaptation, the bar was set high. Watching IT in Ipswich’s brand-new Empire cinema, I was hopeful yet apprehensive.

Strengths and Surprises

The new IT stands apart with some smart changes. The setting is updated to the 1980s, and the film focuses solely on the childhood timeline—eliminating the adult sequences from the original dual structure. This streamlines the narrative and gives the story sharper focus.

Casting a group of largely unknown child actors was bold, but the risk pays off. Sophia Lillis as Beverly is a standout—captivating in every scene. While the Stranger Things connection (Finn Wolfhard as Richie) adds familiarity, the rest of the Losers Club cast delivers fresh energy. The visuals are another highlight. Watching the film on the big screen enhances its cinematic power—something a home viewing couldn’t replicate.

Is it scary? For those unfamiliar with the story, possibly. But for long-time fans, much of the suspense is diminished by familiarity. Pennywise has been copied so often that his presence no longer shocks.

“IT is basically Stranger Things crossed with Stand By Me.”

I give it a 7/10. It works well as a standalone, but comparisons to the original knock it back slightly. To paraphrase Sir Geoffrey Boycott: “Never judge a team’s score until both sides have had a bat.” With Chapter Two still to come, the full picture remains incomplete.

— Verso

---

Kato’s Take: Mixed Feelings in a Stunning Setting

Our first visit to the new Empire Cinema in Ipswich made an impression. The screen was enormous, the recliner seating comfortable, and the environment perfect for a premiere viewing. (Apart from Jamie’s noisy ascent, which earned us a few disapproving glances.)

I’m generally open to remakes—I liked Ghostbusters and even prefer the remake of Miracle on 34th Street. But IT fell flat. Some of the original dialogue remained, and Richie (again, the Stranger Things kid) gave a great performance. Yet overall, it felt rushed and under-produced.

Tim Curry’s original Pennywise had a twisted charm that Bill Skarsgård’s version lacked. Curry’s portrayal was unforgettable—equal parts terrifying and oddly charismatic. Skarsgård’s version didn’t resonate the same way.

I’ve read the book, albeit a while back, and I’ll reserve full judgment until Chapter Two lands. But based on this first half? A bit meh.

6/10.

— Kato

---

In Summary

The 2017 remake of IT is a respectable attempt to update a horror classic for a new generation. It boasts strong visuals, committed performances, and a more focused storyline. However, it struggles to escape the shadow of its predecessor. For fans of the original, it’s an engaging reimagining—but not an unforgettable one.